Covid-19 and the response of authorities in proclaimed democratic states around the world has clearly illustrated that while all citizens are notionally equal, some are more equal than most others — while a tiny minority are very much more equal than the rest.
While the media often concentrates on the fact that the likes of Britain’s Prince Charles or some other notable has succumbed to the virus, this does not mean that we are all, equally, “in the same boat”.
We are “in the same boat” only in that this particular virus can be transmitted from person to person in a world that has become a global village where the generally better off can travel freely to almost everywhere. This adds another dimension to the historic fact that earlier epidemics — from bubonic plague to smallpox — tended to follow trade routes in a world much less integrated than it is today.
And, throughout history, it has been the elderly and those with immune systems that could either not cope or were compromised who mostly succumbed to these diseases. The majority of those in these most vulnerable categories are the poor, often living in cramped and squalid conditions, malnourished and without adequate sanitation, let alone medical care.
These are conditions where contagion breeds, where tuberculosis, dysentery and other debilitating and all too often deadly diseases proliferate. But there is little official attention paid while these diseases are contained among the among the huddled masses in their shacks and makeshift shelters.
In a world of plenty, where the wastage of food and other resources occurs on a monumental scale, there can be no justification for these conditions. Yet, for too long, and by too many, they have been considered “normal”.
This is a normal we should never wish to maintain or return to. As a recent graffitto in London, UK, noted: “We can’t return to normal because the normal we had was precisely the problem.”
And nothing has changed because some of the super rich have thrown down a few more crumbs from their over stuffed tables. It should be noted that this apparent largesse was aimed not at democratic change, but at trying to ensure a return to the world as it was; to maintain “business as usual”.
Yet this business — a system based on competition and which places the accumulation of profit before the welfare of people — is, as the London graffitto correctly noted, precisely the problem. It is also, incidentally, in glaring contradiction to the South African Bill of Rights or even such policies as those listed in the government’s National Housing Code (NHC) of 2004.
In its Upgrading of Informal Settlements Programme the NHC promised to “upgrade the living conditions of millions of poor people”. This pledge to provide “secure tenure and access to basic services and housing” repeated the assurance made a decade earlier by then housing minister Joe Slovo.
Instead we have multiple squalid breeding grounds of contagion, rife with TB and awaiting the onslaught of Covid-19. But this is normal in a profit before people system.
And those who own, control and manipulate the system are also trapped within it. As such, it is useless appealing to the good nature or morality of those at the apex of national and global exploitation. Put bluntly: good bosses go bust.
In order to survive — let alone thrive — profits have to be maximised. It is a simple matter of cost/benefit analysis. In other words: the benefits (profit) must always outweigh the costs, material, human or environmental.
This is a “normal” to which we should never wish to return.
Tariq
April 6, 2020
You’re absolutely right so check out ourveryown.co.za for the alternative
Clit Oris
April 6, 2020
Well Terry, the other day I saw a T-shirt with the apt slogan “Don’t breed more than you can feed” Maybe these randy grubs should limit the size of their families, invest in condoms and stop burning down their schools, so that their off-spring can compete in the open markets. How’s that for a thought?
The free airtime that they demand…. Where does that need fit in, in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs? Can you please explain that one for me meneer…… as it seems that you are all knowing!
Terry Bell
April 9, 2020
Again another comment from someone using a crude pseudonym. And the comment itself is an adequate reflection of the mentality that hides behind facile disguises. Interesting, however, that the racism is now not as overt as perhaps it was in the past. Even the Rev Malthus might have been appalled at such support.
Reg Austin
April 15, 2020
Hi Terry and Barbara. I trust you are avoiding the pandemic, but keeping in touch with the universal failure to prepare for it. Bad news for the remaining Climate Change optimists. I’m in unplanned isolation, back in Camberwell, having been suddenly “extracted”, by my daughters, from uninsured exposure to the Zimbabwean Public Health (?) system, to Boris and Cummings’ more sophisticated form of PR reassurance. In SA there must be intense sense of relief that you’ve escaped the Double Whammy of Zuma and Corona, and I hope provides some basis for guarded short term optimism. Stay well. Love. Reg and Olive. Sent from my iPhone
>
Terry Bell
April 18, 2020
Praise be the Austin daughters. Barbara in particular has been concerned about you preparing to weather what passes for a health system in Zim. We are managing here while cynically (?) observing the often contradictory attempts to apply a first world response in an effective third world environment. How does one apply a lockdown and social distancing in the squatter camps, let alone the “high density townships”. Especially when, with an official expanded definition unemployment rate of near 39%, most workers live from day to day scavenging or doing casual labour. And all sales of liquor and cigarettes have been banned, resulting in an almost immediate black market. Also banned is the bottling of all wine — even that intended for export — not already bottled by the time of lockdown. And yesterday all rotisserie chicken and pies and bread baked in store was banned.