South Africa farm employer organisation AgriSA has met with trade union representatives in an effort to strike a deal to allow unionisation on farms — and especially in the winelands of the Western Cape. “Most farmers still will not allow union representatives onto their properties,” says Federation of Unions (Fedusa) general secretary Dennis George.
Fedusa and representatives of its affiliated general workers’ union, Uasa, are hoping that a “strategic partnership” can be established with AgriSA that will enable union access to farms. “There are so many problems and the only way we can deal with them is through dialogue,” says George.
This initiative comes as the grape harvest in the Western Cape is coming to an end. With it, thousands of part-time jobs will again disappear for some eight months. Along with those jobs will go the only income for families whose shacks spawl across the unproductive and often rocky areas alongside the fields of trellised vines.
These are the men and women who were to the forefront of the protests in January and February last year when farmworkers downed tools to demand R150 ($15) a day for their labour. In the absence of any serious union presence on the farms, minimum daily pay is set for farmworkers by the minister of labour “in consultation with labour”.
The rate, until February last year, was R69 ($6.90), an amount that had not been questioned or debated until farmworkers launched a major protest that began in November 2012. There was a brief hiatus over the holiday season before the protests, with their epicentre in De Doorns in the Hex River valley, erupted throughout much of the winelands.
Police were called in, blood flowed, crops were burned and three farm workers died. The end result was a new determination of R105 ($10.50) a day.
Since then there have been numerous complaints about the wage not being fully paid. These have tended to come from permanent workers living on farms who now find themselves charged rates that they say are often exorbitant for formerly free services such as electricity and water.
There is also the age-old device of the “company store” with farmers selling essential goods at inflated prices, often on credit, through farm stores. A number of farmers have also applied to waive the minimum payment on the grounds that they cannot afford it.
But the simple fact is that work opportunities are now ending for thousands of able-bodied men and women who toil as causal workers in the winelands. Many complain that after the hardship and pain of the strikes and protests, little, if anything, has changed and that some individuals have profited at the workers’ expense.
Thanks to mechanised harvesting, there were already fewer jobs this year than there might have been in the recent past, given the size of the harvest for both table and wine grapes.
“Overall, the effect of the strike has been negative,” admits Trevor Christians, general secretary of CSAAWU the small but relatively active agricultural workers’ union centred on the Robertson region. He notes that widespread cynicism about trade unions has also emerged among many farmworkers. This has resulted in apathy, but with a strong undercurrent of anger.
It was this anger that exploded in November 2012. Now some of that anger seems to be directed at Bawusa, the union that played a prominent role in the strikes. It is headed by controversial pig farming businessman and “self-supporting parish pastor”, Nosey Pieterse.
In recent interviews, Pieterse has referred to Bawusa as the Building and Allied Workers’ Union. But no such union exists. According to the registrar of trade unions, Pieterse is listed as general secretary of the the BAWSI Agricultural Workers’ Union.
This union is now being investigated by the labour department. Unsurprisingly, since BAWSI is the Black Association of the Wine and Spirit Industry, a close corporation that has been involved in multi-million rand deals in the wine, spirit and farming sectors. Pieterse was also the chairman of Lindiwe Wines that went bust in 2008 owing R5 million ($500,000).
Apart from confirming that an investigation is underway, there was no comment from the registrar of trade unions. But a senior department official noted: “It seems ridiculous to have a business enterprise doubling as a trade union.”
It also seems to be a recipe for further bitterness in the winelands with allegations of bribery and corruption rampant. “All we need is decent union organisation,” says Christians. As regards the Fedusa initiative, nobody seems to be holding their breath.
Mark Whelan Writes
April 16, 2014
The meeting between AgriSA and the unions seems like a small, but positive step. Farmers’ hands do seem to be tied here, but I do wish for a de-politicisation of the unions who pledge support on behalf of the workers. There appear to be too many vested commercial interests from the top down. If the Labour department were fair-minded, they could have initiated reforms long before the first wave of strikes.
While union reps collect inflated, unearned salary cheques from the workers, perhaps it is time for both workers and business owners to work on their own to solve this tragic problem. But, what do I know?
Terry Bell
April 18, 2014
The culture of farming in South Africa is steeped in a form of latter day feudalism and this needs to be broken. Hopefully the negotiations with AgriSA and unions can help in this regard. Democratic unionisation on the farms would also be the best way forward. But, of course, there are various agendas in play, from farmers, government, and unions. The major danger, however, is not the established unions, however bureaucratically controlled. It comes from the opportunists cashing in on the plight of farm workers and what is often the incompetence of the established unions.
Government could, of course, have reformed, especially the wage structure, long before the strikes. And what is often forgotten is that the pathetic R69 casual daily wage determination was made by the minister IN CONSULTATION with the government’s alliance partner and the major labour federation, Cosatu.